Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

environmentalMedium should be part of the Samples entity #60

Closed
ericcrandall opened this issue Aug 25, 2021 · 3 comments
Closed

environmentalMedium should be part of the Samples entity #60

ericcrandall opened this issue Aug 25, 2021 · 3 comments

Comments

@ericcrandall
Copy link

Currently in Events. Defined as the medium displaced by the sample, so is more relevant to the sample than the sampling event.

@jdeck88
Copy link
Member

jdeck88 commented Aug 25, 2021

Consider a duck... environmental medium could be water if it is floating on water or swimming when captured... Or it could be air if shot of the air. Thus, the medium is dependent more on the place and time that the individual (or sample) was isolated from the environment.

@ericcrandall
Copy link
Author

ericcrandall commented Aug 26, 2021

Right, but hunters or biologists who are collecting ducks on a single expedition might shoot them in the water or shoot them in the air, and so the field could be different per sample.

Also, in the datathon we have often been using | delimiters for multiple media displaced by a sample - plants being the most obvious one. They (almost) always displace "soil | air".

@jdeck88
Copy link
Member

jdeck88 commented Aug 27, 2021

environmentalMedium is a property of the broader environmentalContext, which includes similar terms like habitat, elevation, and temperature which we have grouped generally into properties of the event entity. Those attributes describing the conditions surrounding the materialSample that was isolated from the natural world

Re: the second point about multiple environmentalMedia is interesting. I created a new issue #62

Am closing this issue for now but feel free to re-open if the first point presents some urgency!

@jdeck88 jdeck88 closed this as completed Aug 27, 2021
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants