You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
I have a simple question: the epic2 output comes in BED-similar format, however, I'm not sure if the output is really 0-based. When I do peak calling, if I check the minimum peak size obtained (which should be equal to the --bin-size argument), by doing End - Start, I get 1 bp less than --bin-size.
E.g. when peak calling with default parameters, the minimum peak size I observe is 199 bp. Thus, to get 200 bp, I would have to do End - Start + 1, which is compatible with the output being 1-based instead of 0-based.
Could you confirm this?
thanks for your help!
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
Thanks for the response!
But then (and sorry for the misguided/ignorant question), does that mean that the window sizes are actually 199 bp wide?
I was trying to compare them to the UCSC coordinate systems where 0-start + 1-end means the end coordinate is excluded from the intervals. But maybe the meaning here is different or I am (probably) confused.
Hi!
Thank you for your work!!
I have a simple question: the epic2 output comes in BED-similar format, however, I'm not sure if the output is really 0-based. When I do peak calling, if I check the minimum peak size obtained (which should be equal to the
--bin-size
argument), by doingEnd - Start
, I get 1 bp less than--bin-size
.E.g. when peak calling with default parameters, the minimum peak size I observe is 199 bp. Thus, to get 200 bp, I would have to do
End - Start + 1
, which is compatible with the output being 1-based instead of 0-based.Could you confirm this?
thanks for your help!
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: