We read every piece of feedback, and take your input very seriously.
To see all available qualifiers, see our documentation.
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
I just noticed that in PredictionTuple, we use source_id and target_identifier to refer to source and target IDs, respectively: https://github.com/biopragmatics/biomappings/blob/master/src/biomappings/resources/__init__.py#L78 Is there some reason for doing it this way or could we standardize to id or identifier?
source_id
target_identifier
id
identifier
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
No branches or pull requests
I just noticed that in PredictionTuple, we use
source_id
andtarget_identifier
to refer to source and target IDs, respectively:https://github.com/biopragmatics/biomappings/blob/master/src/biomappings/resources/__init__.py#L78
Is there some reason for doing it this way or could we standardize to
id
oridentifier
?The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: