You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
In ~22% of the dataset (1294 / 6011 records), the nutrient wasn't actually found in the food (object.nutrientAmount = 0). I'm not sure if we want to keep this info or not - since it means there WASN'T a relationship found between the nutrient and the food.
It's not an issue for BTE use because I am using the BioThings filter parameter to only retrieve records with amount > 0.
(based on biothings/biothings_explorer#683 (comment))
I previously brought this up in #170 (comment) but it wasn't addressed.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
In ~22% of the dataset (1294 / 6011 records), the nutrient wasn't actually found in the food (object.nutrientAmount = 0). I'm not sure if we want to keep this info or not - since it means there WASN'T a relationship found between the nutrient and the food.
It's not an issue for BTE use because I am using the BioThings
filter
parameter to only retrieve records with amount > 0.(based on biothings/biothings_explorer#683 (comment))
I previously brought this up in #170 (comment) but it wasn't addressed.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: