Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Why bitcoin.org promotes third party wallets? #1185

Closed
jl2012 opened this issue Dec 28, 2015 · 3 comments
Closed

Why bitcoin.org promotes third party wallets? #1185

jl2012 opened this issue Dec 28, 2015 · 3 comments
Assignees
Labels

Comments

@jl2012
Copy link
Contributor

jl2012 commented Dec 28, 2015

If you don't have exclusive right to move your bitcoin, you don't have any bitcoin. The balance shown in the wallet is only Bitcoin IOU, not Bitcoin.

With OP_CLTV, and the upcoming OP_CSV and segwit, users can retain exclusive right to move their bitcoin in a third party wallet (with time cost), with _all_ benefits of third party wallet, e.g. instant payment, instant exchange, green address. Third party wallets should be given a grace period to upgrade before they get delisted.

@crwatkins
Copy link
Contributor

Current bitcoin.org listing criteria found at https://github.com/bitcoin-dot-org/bitcoin.org/blob/master/README.md#wallets specify the conditions under which wallets (including custodial wallets) are listed. I've started a discussion at #1109 soliciting input which will very likely lead to a proposal for a separate category for such wallets and perhaps new listing criteria.

@ABISprotocol
Copy link

Thank you @crwatkins

@harding harding added the Wallets label Jan 6, 2016
@wbnns wbnns self-assigned this Dec 9, 2016
@wbnns
Copy link
Contributor

wbnns commented Dec 9, 2016

@jl2012 Hello, thanks for contributing and sharing your thoughts on this issue. This will be addressed alongside #1109.

@wbnns wbnns closed this as completed Dec 9, 2016
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

5 participants