Skip to content
This repository has been archived by the owner on Oct 21, 2024. It is now read-only.

feat(BUX-120): initializes repository with architecure #1

Merged
merged 3 commits into from
Jul 20, 2023

Conversation

wregulski
Copy link
Contributor

No description provided.

@wregulski wregulski self-assigned this Jul 20, 2023
@wregulski wregulski changed the title [DRAFT] feat: initializes repository with architecure [DRAFT] feat(BUX-120): initializes repository with architecure Jul 20, 2023
.gitignore Show resolved Hide resolved
}
}

func (c *compositeBroadcaster) BestQuote(ctx context.Context, feeCategory, feeType string) error {
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Something to consider:

Maybe we should always return something like Result struct, that apart from the Response from Arc will also contain status of the call: I mean something containing informations like:
Arc 1 - call fail with error
Arc 2 - call finished with success + using response as a result
Arc 3 - skipped
Overall - success

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Ok, we can go this way - this response is mocked but I will think about it when implementing.

factory/factory.go Show resolved Hide resolved
wregulski and others added 2 commits July 20, 2023 14:20
Co-authored-by: Damian Orzepowski <damian.orzepowski@softwarelab.com.pl>
@wregulski wregulski changed the title [DRAFT] feat(BUX-120): initializes repository with architecure feat(BUX-120): initializes repository with architecure Jul 20, 2023
@wregulski wregulski merged commit 8f2ad7b into main Jul 20, 2023
@wregulski wregulski deleted the feat-bux-120 branch July 20, 2023 12:50
Sign up for free to subscribe to this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in.
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants