-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 186
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Consider using inclusive terms rather than Blacklist/Whitelist #241
Comments
Yes of course, thank you for pointing it out. If we don’t get a volunteer before then I'll do it this weekend. |
If you’d like, I can attempt it this weekend! |
Go ahead @dsafanyuk |
@dsafanyuk Thank you for posting this, we now have a plan to address it, check #247 |
I personally don't feel this kind of terminology change will help solve any kind of issue, either in this repository or in the world: this will just add some confusion in a place where those terms have nothing to do with racism, nor they share any ethimological roots with racial discriminations. |
So guys, we did it. Racism is no more. |
Laughable. And the fact that this is still sitting around over a year later just goes to show the true colors being displayed here. Total empty, fake, virtue signaling nonsense. You all should be ashamed. |
Would be possible to change the terms
blackList/whiteList
toallowList/denyList
?Perhaps add an option to use the
allow/deny
alternative to avoid creating a major release change.Thanks for your library!
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: