You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
I would like to know more about the eventual consitency mechanic. Precisely, I would like to know if it is possible that two processes are registered against the same name, and so the temporary replicate would consume a message sent to that name. Which would mean that message would be lost. Is this scenario possible with the static ring?
Thank you
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
Hi,
I would like to know more about the eventual consitency mechanic. Precisely, I would like to know if it is possible that two processes are registered against the same name, and so the temporary replicate would consume a message sent to that name. Which would mean that message would be lost. Is this scenario possible with the static ring?
Thank you
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: