Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Question about eventual consistency in the readme #147

Open
lud opened this issue Jul 2, 2021 · 0 comments
Open

Question about eventual consistency in the readme #147

lud opened this issue Jul 2, 2021 · 0 comments

Comments

@lud
Copy link

lud commented Jul 2, 2021

Hi,

I would like to know more about the eventual consitency mechanic. Precisely, I would like to know if it is possible that two processes are registered against the same name, and so the temporary replicate would consume a message sent to that name. Which would mean that message would be lost. Is this scenario possible with the static ring?

Thank you

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

1 participant