Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

Muttersubstanz und Variant with Substance #4

Open
montanajava opened this issue Sep 19, 2023 · 6 comments
Open

Muttersubstanz und Variant with Substance #4

montanajava opened this issue Sep 19, 2023 · 6 comments
Assignees
@montanajava
Labels
feature A requested feature jira Tag to activate JIRA integration v2 A major release Vs. 2

Comments

@montanajava
Copy link
Collaborator

No description provided.

@montanajava
Copy link
Collaborator Author

montanajava commented Sep 19, 2023 •
edited
Loading

Do substances need to refer to a "mother" substance or "Muttersubstanz", and to a variant?

This is a matter for discussion with infoPhyto.

@montanajava
Copy link
Collaborator Author

@RyanStuder-Work Please verify that this is a requirement. If so, we can tag it with the labels V2 and feature. If not, you can close it with a note that it was rejected.

@RyanStuder-Work
Copy link
Contributor

RyanStuder-Work commented Nov 15, 2023 •
edited
Loading

@montanajava Dies ist gemäss InfoFito eine Anforderung, wie Substanzen künftig aufgeteilt werden könnten (Bsp. Unterteilung der Mikroorganismen). Dies muss somit für den Moment beibehalten werden.
Werden sonst noch genauere Informationen benötigt?

@montanajava montanajava added feature A requested feature v2 A major release Vs. 2 labels Nov 16, 2023
@montanajava
Copy link
Collaborator Author

Labeled as feature and V2

@hurni
Copy link

hurni commented May 13, 2024

Gemäss Ryan: noch immer eine Anforderung (bzw. nicht zurückgezogen). Er hat aber nichts mehr dazu gehört. Stand 13 Mai 2024

@AFoletti AFoletti added the jira Tag to activate JIRA integration label Aug 14, 2024
@AFoletti
Copy link
Member

AFoletti commented Dec 4, 2024

Probably something to be solved at the PSM level rather than in this standard. Will however keep it open for reference

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Assignees

@montanajava montanajava

Labels
feature A requested feature jira Tag to activate JIRA integration v2 A major release Vs. 2
Projects
None yet
Milestone
No milestone
Development

No branches or pull requests
4 participants
@AFoletti @montanajava @hurni @RyanStuder-Work