You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
{{ message }}
This repository has been archived by the owner on Feb 6, 2025. It is now read-only.
Describe the bug
Looks like it was fixed in main reth repo but is still outstanding in v1.1.1 of bsc reth
paradigmxyz/reth#12415
Steps to reproduce
sending a traceBlockByNumber with flatCallTracer
{ "method": "debug_traceBlockByNumber", "params": [ "0x2bd6ea0", { "tracer": "flatCallTracer" } ], "id": 0, "jsonrpc": "2.0" }
Gives the following results for blockHash and Number
"blockHash": "0x0857de5b43690e84bf4f8d9f19e97d191fbe5eedef2f4cc36525190283cfd8ef", "blockNumber": 45969056,
The return blockHash is for blockNumber 45969055 (i.e. the parent)
Node logs
Platform(s)
Linux (x86)
What version/commit are you on?
reth-bsc-cli Version: 1.1.1
Commit SHA: ca0df04
Build Timestamp: 2025-01-21T05:15:15.371410019Z
Build Features: asm_keccak,bsc,jemalloc
Build Profile: maxperf
What database version are you on?
Couldn't figure out how to set the database dir for this command
Which chain / network are you on?
BSC
What type of node are you running?
Archive (default)
What prune config do you use, if any?
No response
If you've built Reth from source, provide the full command you used
No response
Code of Conduct
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: