-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 153
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Fixing iteration-type of for-loop. #165
Comments
Can I take up this issue if no one is working upon it. Kindly assign it to me |
I'm waiting for others' views on this. Therefore, wait for a few days. So, I request you to read the tensor's codebase and try to find bugs or enhancements that you think would improve the tensor. Finding bugs is also a way to contribute. |
Since 20 days, if no one is putting input over this issue , Can i take up this issue ? |
The current loops rely on
auto
deduction or integer suffix for the type that may not be a correct iteration type and may produce conversion warnings all over places. Therefore, I propose to removeauto
from the loops and use appropriate and explicit types or use explicit types to initialize the variable. In a long run, it would produce a bug-free code, and it would remove all warnings produced by compilers.From
To
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: