We read every piece of feedback, and take your input very seriously.
To see all available qualifiers, see our documentation.
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Since u have worked in Merkleization of UTXOs in2016/2017, r u aware of these results by Stanford University & others?
. Also, the burden of burned UTXOs?
. What do u think about putting each type coinbase, burned,... etc in a different tree or whatever data structure used to shorten the proof size? https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5343748.0
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
No branches or pull requests
Since u have worked in Merkleization of UTXOs in2016/2017, r u aware of these results by Stanford University & others?
.
Also, the burden of burned UTXOs?
.
What do u think about putting each type coinbase, burned,... etc in a different tree or whatever data structure used to shorten the proof size?
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5343748.0
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: