You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Thank you for your work!
I am writing to ask if there is any reason why the IBS1 count is not included in the relatedness results, I think it would be a clear way to be able to distinguish what is left out of IBS0/2, so that one could easily be able to easily determine if it is IBS1 or Unknown.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
Thank you for your work!
I am writing to ask if there is any reason why the IBS1 count is not included in the relatedness results, I think it would be a clear way to be able to distinguish what is left out of IBS0/2, so that one could easily be able to easily determine if it is IBS1 or Unknown.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: