Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Revert "Refactor using PlatformString" #29

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Nov 19, 2024
Merged

Conversation

mikusaq
Copy link
Contributor

@mikusaq mikusaq commented Nov 19, 2024

Reverted change have accidentally removed any_machine flag recognition when building.

This reverts commit 051bd8a.

Summary by CodeRabbit

  • New Features

    • Integrated SSH credentials into the build configuration process.
    • Enhanced handling of build structures with new dependency management.
  • Improvements

    • Simplified method signatures by removing the platformString parameter, streamlining the overall build process.
  • Bug Fixes

    • Improved error handling during initialization failures.

This change have accidentally removed any_machine flag recognition when
building.

This reverts commit 051bd8a.
@mikusaq mikusaq requested a review from koudis November 19, 2024 18:32
@mikusaq mikusaq self-assigned this Nov 19, 2024
Copy link

coderabbitai bot commented Nov 19, 2024

Walkthrough

The changes involve modifications to the bap-builder/PackageMode.go and modules/bringauto_config/Config.go files, primarily centered around the removal of the platformString parameter from various function signatures. This adjustment simplifies the function calls and internal logic related to package building and configuration. A new function, determinePlatformStringFromBuild, has been introduced to manage platform string determination. Additionally, the Config.go file has integrated SSH credentials into the build process, reflecting a shift in how dependencies are managed.

Changes

File Path Change Summary
bap-builder/PackageMode.go - Removed platformString parameter from BuildPackage, buildAllPackages, buildSinglePackage, and buildAndCopyPackage functions.
- Added determinePlatformStringFromBuild function.
modules/bringauto_config/Config.go - Added import for bringauto_ssh module.
- Removed platformString parameter from GetBuildStructure and fillBuildStructure methods.
- Updated fillBuildStructure to initialize tmpPackage with new SSH credentials.

Sequence Diagram(s)

sequenceDiagram
    participant User
    participant Builder
    participant Config

    User->>Builder: Call BuildPackage(cmdLine, contextPath)
    Builder->>Config: GetBuildStructure(imageName)
    Config-->>Builder: Return Build Structure
    Builder->>Builder: Process Build
    Builder-->>User: Return Success/Error
Loading

Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media?

❤️ Share
🪧 Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

  • Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
    • I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>, please review it.
    • Generate unit testing code for this file.
    • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
  • Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai generate unit testing code for this file.
    • @coderabbitai modularize this function.
  • PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai gather interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table. Additionally, render a pie chart showing the language distribution in the codebase.
    • @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and generate unit testing code.
    • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.
    • @coderabbitai help me debug CodeRabbit configuration file.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)

  • @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
  • @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
  • @coderabbitai review to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai full review to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again.
  • @coderabbitai summary to regenerate the summary of the PR.
  • @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
  • @coderabbitai configuration to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai help to get help.

Other keywords and placeholders

  • Add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.
  • Add @coderabbitai summary to generate the high-level summary at a specific location in the PR description.
  • Add @coderabbitai anywhere in the PR title to generate the title automatically.

CodeRabbit Configuration File (.coderabbit.yaml)

  • You can programmatically configure CodeRabbit by adding a .coderabbit.yaml file to the root of your repository.
  • Please see the configuration documentation for more information.
  • If your editor has YAML language server enabled, you can add the path at the top of this file to enable auto-completion and validation: # yaml-language-server: $schema=https://coderabbit.ai/integrations/schema.v2.json

Documentation and Community

  • Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
  • Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
  • Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.

Copy link

sonarcloud bot commented Nov 19, 2024

Copy link

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 0

🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (2)
modules/bringauto_config/Config.go (1)

125-128: Consider enhancing error handling for SSH credentials

While the SSH credentials integration is implemented correctly, consider adding specific error handling for SSH-related failures to improve debugging capabilities.

 sshCreds := bringauto_prerequisites.CreateAndInitialize[bringauto_ssh.SSHCredentials]()
+if err := sshCreds.Validate(); err != nil {
+    return fmt.Errorf("invalid SSH credentials: %w", err)
+}
 tmpPackage := config.Package

 err = bringauto_prerequisites.Initialize(&tmpPackage, sshCreds, defaultDocker)
bap-builder/PackageMode.go (1)

415-415: Remove redundant mode assignment

The mode is already set to ModeAuto in the struct initialization at line 413.

-		platformStringStruct.Mode = bringauto_package.ModeAuto
📜 Review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between ffa9988 and d0e0ba9.

📒 Files selected for processing (2)
  • bap-builder/PackageMode.go (7 hunks)
  • modules/bringauto_config/Config.go (4 hunks)
🔇 Additional comments (5)
modules/bringauto_config/Config.go (2)

9-9: LGTM: SSH module import added

The addition of the bringauto_ssh import aligns with the new SSH credentials integration.


86-92: Verify any_machine flag recognition after platformString removal

The removal of the platformString parameter simplifies the method signature, but we should verify that this change properly restores the any_machine flag recognition mentioned in the PR objectives.

✅ Verification successful

Let me gather more specific information about the any_machine flag implementation and its relationship with the platform string.


Based on the code analysis, I can now provide the final response since I have sufficient information about the any_machine flag handling.

The any_machine flag recognition remains intact after platformString parameter removal

The removal of the platformString parameter from GetBuildStructure is safe because:

  • The any_machine flag is handled within the PlatformString type itself through its Mode field (ModeAnyMachine)
  • The platform string processing and any_machine handling occurs in the PlatformString.determinePlatformString method
  • When ModeAnyMachine is set, it automatically sets Machine to "any" while still determining the distro details
🏁 Scripts executed

The following scripts were executed for the analysis:

Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Search for any_machine flag usage in the codebase
rg -l "any_machine" 

# Look for platform string related code that might affect flag recognition
ast-grep --pattern 'PlatformString' 

Length of output: 793


Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Check the PlatformString implementation and any_machine handling
cat modules/bringauto_package/PlatformString.go

# Check how the Config.go uses platform string
rg -A 5 -B 5 "platformString" modules/bringauto_config/Config.go

# Look for any build structure related code that might handle platform strings
ast-grep --pattern 'func $_(platformString $$$) {
  $$$
}'

Length of output: 6920

bap-builder/PackageMode.go (3)

218-220: LGTM: Function calls properly simplified

The removal of the platformString parameter from these function calls is consistent with the refactoring, and the control flow remains correct.


405-425: LGTM: Proper handling of any_machine mode

The function correctly:

  1. Checks for any_machine mode
  2. Creates a specialized platform string
  3. Initializes it with SSH credentials and Docker info
  4. Preserves the original mode while updating the machine string

This implementation aligns with the PR objective of fixing the any_machine flag recognition.


358-362: Verify platform string determination for any_machine packages

The platform string is now determined per build configuration, which should fix the any_machine flag recognition issue mentioned in the PR objectives.

Let's verify the any_machine flag handling:

✅ Verification successful

Let me gather more information about the platform string determination logic.


Based on the code analysis, I can now provide the final response:

Platform string determination for any_machine packages is correctly implemented

The implementation properly handles the any_machine mode by:

  • Converting any_machine mode to auto mode with proper initialization
  • Setting machine architecture to "any" when ModeAnyMachine is specified
  • Preserving the distro name and release version from the build environment

The changes in determinePlatformStringFromBuild function align with the existing any_machine handling in PlatformString.go, ensuring consistent behavior across the codebase.

🏁 Scripts executed

The following scripts were executed for the analysis:

Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Search for any_machine mode usage in package definitions
rg -l "ModeAnyMachine|any_machine" 

# Search for platform string determination logic
ast-grep --pattern 'if $_.Mode == bringauto_package.ModeAnyMachine {
  $$$
}'

Length of output: 649


Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Check the platform string determination implementation
rg -A 10 "func determinePlatformString" 

# Check the any_machine mode handling in PlatformString.go
cat modules/bringauto_package/PlatformString.go

# Look for any_machine related tests
rg -l "TestAnyMachine|test.*any.*machine" 

Length of output: 8578

@mikusaq mikusaq merged commit 9494381 into master Nov 19, 2024
2 checks passed
@mikusaq mikusaq deleted the BAF-997/fix-any-machine branch November 19, 2024 18:45
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants