You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
{{ message }}
This repository has been archived by the owner on Mar 31, 2023. It is now read-only.
There is no way to pass a functional thingy as a parameter to a dataClay method (or as a return of it).
This includes lambda, functions or methods.
Some of those are not serializable (like lambda) and adding the feature may be challenging (like closures related to functions) and not a whole lot usefeul. However, supporting references to methods of registered classes seems a little more manageable and may be suited for certain use cases.
We may add this feature for all or a subset of functional thingies.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
There is no way to pass a functional thingy as a parameter to a dataClay method (or as a return of it).
This includes lambda, functions or methods.
Some of those are not serializable (like lambda) and adding the feature may be challenging (like closures related to functions) and not a whole lot usefeul. However, supporting references to methods of registered classes seems a little more manageable and may be suited for certain use cases.
We may add this feature for all or a subset of functional thingies.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: