Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Container fails to start without admin instance #332

Closed
chah90 opened this issue Apr 9, 2023 · 5 comments
Closed

Container fails to start without admin instance #332

chah90 opened this issue Apr 9, 2023 · 5 comments
Assignees
Labels
enhancement It's not a bug, but it's worth an enhancement. fixed in beta This issue ist fixed in actual beta version.

Comments

@chah90
Copy link

chah90 commented Apr 9, 2023

Hi,

I have an ioBroker instance on an Raspberry Pi Zero 2 using this great Docker image. To save RAM, I had disabled the admin instance via console when it is not needed. This worked well until the end of last year, before changes in the startup script for the hostname check result in a terminating error on startup:

There was a problem detecting the admin instance of your iobroker.
Make sure the ioBroker installation you use has an admin instance or try again with a fresh installation and restore your configuration.
For more details see https://docs.buanet.de/iobroker-docker-image/docs/#restore

I worked around the problem by not disabling the admin instance. But I get warnings about litte memory regularly, I really would like so save the ~50MB. Therefore my question: Is it possible to prevent the terminating error in the startup sequence without the need of an admin instance?

@buanet buanet self-assigned this Apr 11, 2023
@buanet buanet added the enhancement It's not a bug, but it's worth an enhancement. label Apr 11, 2023
@Apollon77
Copy link
Contributor

Or try to use compact mode and run admin in ame group as the controller ... then you save 25-30MB already

@chah90
Copy link
Author

chah90 commented Apr 13, 2023

Thanks for the hint, I will try that 😊

@winnyschuster
Copy link

Maybe an ENV like NOADMIN=true can skip the test, for average users this test makes sense i think

@buanet
Copy link
Owner

buanet commented Apr 14, 2023

It's included in new beta release. Please test.

Regards,
André

@buanet buanet added the fixed in beta This issue ist fixed in actual beta version. label Apr 14, 2023
@chah90
Copy link
Author

chah90 commented Apr 15, 2023

Works great, thanks for the quick solution😊

@chah90 chah90 closed this as completed Apr 15, 2023
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
enhancement It's not a bug, but it's worth an enhancement. fixed in beta This issue ist fixed in actual beta version.
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

4 participants