Not any faster than CtrlP's default matcher on big projects

[patspam]

On a project with 100k files, searching wasn't any faster for me than when using Ctrl-P's built-in matcher :(

(also, the number of files is hard-coded to a 20k limit)

[burke]

Sorry, I don't have any projects even remotely approaching that size to develop for. I think you're going to start running into issues where you just can't conceivably handle that much data on a per-keypress paradigm, which is what this ultimately is.

[patspam]

Speed is my only motivation for installing a custom matcher.

Not to worry, I just found another one that handles 100k files nicely:
https://github.com/FelikZ/ctrlp-py-matcher