Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

TODO - Manuscript Task: Verify Sleep Apnea Phenotype #13

Closed
2 tasks done
callahantiff opened this issue Mar 12, 2019 · 3 comments
Closed
2 tasks done

TODO - Manuscript Task: Verify Sleep Apnea Phenotype #13

callahantiff opened this issue Mar 12, 2019 · 3 comments
Assignees
Labels
publications+presentations TODO: Publications + Presentations

Comments

@callahantiff
Copy link
Owner

callahantiff commented Mar 12, 2019

Creating as a separate issue to break-up issue #2

Finalizing the Sleep Apnea Phenotype

Case Criteria:

  • Presence of specific sleep apnea codes (ICD9 code)
  • Presence of >1 procedures (CPT or HCPCS code)

Control Criteria:

  • No control group defined

Questions:

  • No control group defined, should we try to create one?

  • The phenotype definition states that, "The computable phenotype can be cross-referenced against the following to increase specificity: AHI (sleep lab report) >= 5 or HCPCS code E0601 (CPAP) or E0470 or E0471 (BIPAP) or A7034 (CPAP mask) or HCPCS A9270 or E)486 (Mandibular devices) or CPT 95811 (CPAP titration) or CPT 95811 (Split night CPAP titration)." I think we should include these in the sense that if a patient meets the diagnosis code criteria, they should also have had one of these procedures. What do you think?


@tdbennett, can you please advise on these questions?

@tdbennett
Copy link
Collaborator

  1. No new control groups. Perfect is the enemy of done.

  2. Because the phenotype is vague ("can be cross-referenced...") let's use the phenotype as is and then plan on a sensitivity analysis looking at requiring the HCPCS codes with the goal of improving the phenotype for subsequent users.

@callahantiff
Copy link
Owner Author

Great, works for me! I will make a note in the Google Doc.

@callahantiff
Copy link
Owner Author

We have addressed all open questions; closing this issue for now.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
publications+presentations TODO: Publications + Presentations
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants