You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Presence of specific sleep apnea codes (ICD9 code)
Presence of >1 procedures (CPT or HCPCS code)
Control Criteria:
No control group defined
Questions:
No control group defined, should we try to create one?
The phenotype definition states that, "The computable phenotype can be cross-referenced against the following to increase specificity: AHI (sleep lab report) >= 5 or HCPCS code E0601 (CPAP) or E0470 or E0471 (BIPAP) or A7034 (CPAP mask) or HCPCS A9270 or E)486 (Mandibular devices) or CPT 95811 (CPAP titration) or CPT 95811 (Split night CPAP titration)." I think we should include these in the sense that if a patient meets the diagnosis code criteria, they should also have had one of these procedures. What do you think?
@tdbennett, can you please advise on these questions?
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
No new control groups. Perfect is the enemy of done.
Because the phenotype is vague ("can be cross-referenced...") let's use the phenotype as is and then plan on a sensitivity analysis looking at requiring the HCPCS codes with the goal of improving the phenotype for subsequent users.
Creating as a separate issue to break-up issue #2
Finalizing the Sleep Apnea Phenotype
Questions:
@tdbennett, can you please advise on these questions?
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: