Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

TODO - Manuscript Task: Verify Non-Alcoholic Fatty Liver Disease Phenotype #17

Closed
2 tasks
callahantiff opened this issue Mar 12, 2019 · 3 comments
Closed
2 tasks
Assignees
Labels
publications+presentations TODO: Publications + Presentations

Comments

@callahantiff
Copy link
Owner

callahantiff commented Mar 12, 2019

Creating as a separate issue to break-up issue #2

Finalizing the Non-Alcoholic Fatty Liver Disease Phenotype

Case Criteria:

  • CASE TYPE 1
    • Presence of certain chronic liver diseases (ICD9 code)
    • Evidence by text positive for diagnostic phrases of hepatic steatosis, either by imaging or by histology in biopsy report (procedure keyword)
    • NOT presence of ANY exclusionary codes (ICD9 code)
    • NOT presence of ANY medications (preferably exclude when use >3 months) (medication string)

  • CASE TYPE 2
    • Presence of certain chronic liver diseases (ICD9 code)
    • Evidence by text positive for hepatic steatosis of in clinical notes (condition, drug, procedure, observation keywords)
    • NOT presence of ANY exclusionary codes (ICD9 code)
    • NOT presence of ANY medications (preferably exclude when use >3 months) (medication string)

Control Criteria:

  • NOT presence of ANY exclusionary codes (ICD9 code)

Questions:

  • Can we search for any occurrence of "hepatic steatosis” in the patient record to satisfy this case criteria, "Evidence of hepatic steatosis, either by imaging or by histology in biopsy report”?

  • For Case Type 2, can we search for any occurrence of the following terms, in the patient record to satisfy this case criteria, "Evidence of hepatic steatosis in clinical notes”? Or, should the two case types be combined given that we do not have notes (for the pediatric data) as the criteria requires.
    • steatosis
    • steatohepatitis
    • non-alcoholic fatty liver disease
    • non-alcoholic steatohepatitis
    • fatty liver-non-alcoholic
    • NAFL
    • NAFLD
    • NASH
    • NAS
    • fatty liver
    • activity score

For both questions above, we get the following hits:

Data source_string standard_code standard_name vocabulary_id domain_id
Both fatty liver 716379000 Acute fatty liver of pregnancy SNOMED Condition
Both fatty liver 50325005 Alcoholic fatty liver SNOMED Condition
Both fatty liver 371330000 Fatty liver SNOMED Condition
Both fatty liver 197315008 Non-alcoholic fatty liver SNOMED Condition
Both fatty liver 5360002 Nonalcoholic fatty liver SNOMED Condition
Both fatty liver 371329005 Nonalcoholic fatty liver SNOMED Condition
DS2 non-alcoholic fatty liver disease 1079451000000100 Assessment using NAFLD (Non-Alcoholic Fatty Liver Disease) fibrosis score SNOMED Procedure
DS2 non-alcoholic fatty liver disease 1079441000000100 NAFLD (Non-Alcoholic Fatty Liver Disease) fibrosis score SNOMED Observation
DS2 non-alcoholic fatty liver disease 1079461000000100 Non-Alcoholic Fatty Liver Disease (NAFLD) fibrosis score SNOMED Observation
Both steatohepatitis 722866000 Non-alcoholic fatty liver disease without non-alcoholic steatohepatitis SNOMED Condition
DS2 steatohepatitis 722866000 Non-alcoholic fatty liver disease without non-alcoholic steatohepatitis SNOMED Condition
Both steatohepatitis 442685003 Nonalcoholic steatohepatitis SNOMED Condition
Both steatohepatitis 442191002 Steatohepatitis SNOMED Condition
DS2 steatohepatitis 765482002 Steatohepatitis caused by ingestible alcohol SNOMED Condition

@tdbennett, can you please advise on these questions?

@tdbennett
Copy link
Collaborator

I think I'm probably missing a few things here (what is both vs. DS2?). But, that said, I'm not sure that we can do this phenotype at all. Both case types require notes (1 - imaging or pathology reports, 2 - clinical notes), which we don't have.

What am I missing?

@callahantiff
Copy link
Owner Author

callahantiff commented Mar 26, 2019

I think that I should have started by asking that question first. It's what I meant to ask in my second question -- whether or not this phenotype was possible given our data limitations. So, it sounds like we want to exclude this and then close this issue?

@callahantiff
Copy link
Owner Author

Phenotype requires data that is not available for peds and adults -- closing this issue and removing this from the list of eligible phenotypes.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
publications+presentations TODO: Publications + Presentations
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants