Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Name for new API for subscription events to location verification #69

Closed
jlurien opened this issue Jun 26, 2023 · 6 comments
Closed

Name for new API for subscription events to location verification #69

jlurien opened this issue Jun 26, 2023 · 6 comments
Labels
question Further information is requested

Comments

@jlurien
Copy link
Collaborator

jlurien commented Jun 26, 2023

As agreed for #18, we should move the new API proposal in PR #49 to a new API spec. Which name do you prefer:

  • geofencing
  • location-verification-subscription
  • Other, please suggest
@jlurien jlurien assigned bigludo7 and unassigned bigludo7 Jun 26, 2023
@jlurien jlurien added the question Further information is requested label Jun 26, 2023
@JoachimDahlgren
Copy link
Collaborator

The original description of the purpose of this new API that reads "So that developers are informed if a device is leaving or entering the "radius". This is important for tracking devices for Presetting of Homesettings or for tracking of logistics and more".

This aligns with how geofencing is usually described. Using the term geofencing would also be beneficial in case we later want to expand the API to handle multiple devices or even any device moving into or out of an area.

@alpaycetin74
Copy link
Collaborator

I tend to think geofencing is a better representation of what this api does.

@bigludo7
Copy link
Collaborator

Following @JoachimDahlgren explanation today in team meeting, I also think that geofencing is a better name (in particular to introduce later a geotracking api).

@jlurien
Copy link
Collaborator Author

jlurien commented Jul 20, 2023

For TEF, geofencing is also acceptable.

@akoshunyadi
Copy link
Contributor

From DT side we can also accept geofencing. Althought we think that not use case specific names are generally better, but in this case the API is specific and the long name would just confuse API users.

@jlurien
Copy link
Collaborator Author

jlurien commented Jul 27, 2023

It seems that geofencing is the preferred name, so we can apply to #74 @akoshunyadi

@jlurien jlurien closed this as completed Jul 27, 2023
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
question Further information is requested
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

5 participants