Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Potential alignment of duration format between quality-on-demand and qos-profiles #304

Open
hdamker opened this issue Jun 14, 2024 · 1 comment
Labels
enhancement New feature or request QoD-backlog

Comments

@hdamker
Copy link
Collaborator

hdamker commented Jun 14, 2024

Problem description

From #291 and the PR #296 there is one point left to be addressed potentially later:

Within quality-on-demand uses seconds for duration, within qos-profiles there is a duration object for that.

Possible evolution

A potential consolidation with a common duration format based on the outcome of the discussion in camaraproject/Commonalities#137

Alternative solution

Keep the current formats. The duration object within qos-profiles allows to define the duration also in seconds.

Additional context

See comments #296 (comment) and #296 (comment) where this point was discussed.

@hdamker
Copy link
Collaborator Author

hdamker commented Oct 8, 2024

camaraproject/Commonalities#137 is not yet considered within Spring25 scope of Commonalities and anyways without progress since March. Close as not planned?

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
enhancement New feature or request QoD-backlog
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

1 participant