You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Looks like there's a minor bug when it goes to filter out alignments without PAMs in guideAlignments. The PAM regular expression in the code is currently "[ACGTN]GG|GG[ACGTN]", which allows "GGN" PAMs to pass through the filter. "[ACGTN]GG" should be sufficient, since getSeq fetches the PAM 5'->3' relative to the query, regardless of the aligned strand. As it stands, the current code incorrectly allows ~1-2% of alignments through the filter when using the Aguirre GeCKO data.
Best,
Scott
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
Hey all,
Looks like there's a minor bug when it goes to filter out alignments without PAMs in guideAlignments. The PAM regular expression in the code is currently "[ACGTN]GG|GG[ACGTN]", which allows "GGN" PAMs to pass through the filter. "[ACGTN]GG" should be sufficient, since getSeq fetches the PAM 5'->3' relative to the query, regardless of the aligned strand. As it stands, the current code incorrectly allows ~1-2% of alignments through the filter when using the Aguirre GeCKO data.
Best,
Scott
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: