You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
While analyze-snap is super useful for comparing the result of changing the compression algorithm from xz to lzo, there is another comparison which could be useful. Compare an xz/lzo snap with the non-snap package startup time. This shows the difference between the snap and non-snap package could highlight further debugging if necessary.
Perhaps optionally as:
etrace analyze-snap vlc --non-snap /usr/bin/vlc
I'd expect the same 20 runs of the application to be done after the xz/lzo runs.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
While analyze-snap is super useful for comparing the result of changing the compression algorithm from xz to lzo, there is another comparison which could be useful. Compare an xz/lzo snap with the non-snap package startup time. This shows the difference between the snap and non-snap package could highlight further debugging if necessary.
Perhaps optionally as:
etrace analyze-snap vlc --non-snap /usr/bin/vlc
I'd expect the same 20 runs of the application to be done after the xz/lzo runs.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: