You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Which highlights a bigger issue - there's no way of knowing what z-index to use to position something above / under a certain component. In additino to fixing these, we need to document them so you can easily decide which range to use if you want to go above / under a certain component. An interesting article on the subject:
The issue here is the combination of a suite of components. This can not be managed from a central system as the examples above are. There as been a long discussion on the subject in the practises.
I would suggest we try and keep this system if a system at all. As simple as possible. I have not seen many of these issues and the two found initially could be resolved without causing further issues.
Thanks for pointing to the discussion @anthonydillon. Wasn't envisioning anything complicated, maybe something as simple as adding the list of ranges in that other discussion in a more visible place in the documentation might suffice if that's still valid?
We have had some z-index clashes, e.g.:
canonical/snapcraft.io#2765
#3068
Which highlights a bigger issue - there's no way of knowing what z-index to use to position something above / under a certain component. In additino to fixing these, we need to document them so you can easily decide which range to use if you want to go above / under a certain component. An interesting article on the subject:
https://www.smashingmagazine.com/2019/04/z-index-component-based-web-application/
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: