Should logo-ls still be maintainted?

[canta2899]

Opening this discussion in order to interact with all the logo-ls contributors and find out if something can be done in order to keep logo-ls maintained.

[manuth]

I believe the biggest of trouble is keeping track of keeping track of the changes made in Nerd Fonts and potential requests from users on icons for files which haven't been implemented yet.

So I believe that maintaining logo-ls is more of a load of work than anyone wants to bother with.
Maybe some automated processes might help - which, then again, requires a lot of engineering, too.

[manuth]

Alright, then
Shall we create an organization for maintaining logo-ls?

[canta2899]

I'm sorry for not responding to your previous comment, somehow I didn't get any notification.

I think we should consider creating the organization so we can start deploying to package managers (apt, Homebrew, yum, yay, etc.) and, as you mentioned earlier, find a way to keep track of changes in NF and user requests. I originally had this fork detached from the original repo by GitHub with the same aim, but I never found enough time to follow through 🤣.

I'll be very busy with other things until early 2025, so I'm on board with creating the organization and migrating everything there. However, I won't have much time to work on it until January 10th–15th. Shall we put this off for a few days and reconnect soon?

[manuth]

No worries, that's okay 😄
Sounds fine by me!