-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 124
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
loss function for training #19
Comments
Hello @Florence-C For the CARLA paper, the loss function was 0.45 for steer, 0.05 for brake and 0.45 for gas. loss = 0.95(0.45gas+0.45steer+0.05brake) + 0.05 branch For the ICRA paper we were using the following parameters: We kind of needed to change the weights since ICRA used human driving data As for you saying that the ICRA paper action was two dimensional. That Thanks a lot for your interest ! |
Hello @felipecode Thank you for you response ! I'm not sure I understand, there is a separate steering branch ? Or did you mean speed branch ? And thanks for the explanation about the data ! Best |
Hello,
I have a question about the loss used to train the model.
In your paper, the action is apparently two dimensional (steer and acceleration), whereas it seems to be 3-dimensional in the code (steer, acceleration and brake). Which one is the correct one ? And what is the loss for the action ? the squared error between groundtruth and computed action ? Or is there a weigh to give more importance to some aspect of the action (steer for instance) (the lambda in the 6th equation in the paper) ?
Moreover, is the loss for the actions summed with the loss of the speed branch during training ? And if yes, what is the weight of each loss (as the loss for the speed will be much bigger than the loss for the actions).
Thank you in advance
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: