Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

V1 #155

Closed
carueda opened this issue Apr 13, 2022 · 2 comments
Closed

V1 #155

carueda opened this issue Apr 13, 2022 · 2 comments

Comments

@carueda
Copy link
Owner

carueda commented Apr 13, 2022

Just an umbrella entry with the overall goal of looking into a v1.0.0 and beyond.

I've had a preliminary branch for this purpose but with no much time to advance it.

Just in terms of the strategy regarding versioning:

  • should a first 1.0.x just consolidate what's been in place in the set of "asymptotic" 0.99* releases?

    If so, then look into 1.1+.* (or perhaps even 2.*) to depart from that line?

    Or, just start 1.0.* even if breaking compatibility?

    (I'm kind of inclined to the 1.0.0 consolidation with no breaking changes.)

For the future:

  • Proper schema syntax #51 ?
  • proper tscfg library #27 Even though tscfg was conceived primarily as a command line program, the fact is that it has also been used as a library out there. I suppose those users are just happy calling the main directly..
  • Code cleanup(/redesign?). Things have not always evolved in the cleanest way. Though significant contributions have been made by the community (which is amazing!), a revisit of the overall design would be great, in particular to facilitate adjustments depending on target languages/versions..

...

@carueda
Copy link
Owner Author

carueda commented Jun 14, 2022

@johanneshiry @ckittl @sebastian-peter @JustinPihony @zishanbilal @qux42 :

Dear (commit) contributors: Pardon the "mass tagging" here -- no rush of course and probably this may be irrelevant to some of you already, but any comments/reactions would be great. Though my time for this project continues to be rather scarce unfortunately, any input would help take some decisions moving forward. Thanks in advance and best regards.

@carueda
Copy link
Owner Author

carueda commented Aug 3, 2022

Just to update the entry here: version bumped to 1.0.0 and already released -- no breaking changes.

@carueda carueda closed this as completed Oct 8, 2022
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

1 participant