-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 35
Would you consider a license suitable for use as a library in non GPL apps? #9
Comments
Thanks for your query, and my apologies for the long delay in replying. I'm personally okay with doing that, but I need to check with my main coauthor and our institution. I will contact them this week. |
@mhucka Thank you for looking in to this 🙇 |
The institute cleared the way for a license change. It'll be LGPL. I'll put together a new release with the changed license. It might be a little while longer before I can get to it. |
@mhucka You rock! |
@mhucka gentle ping... any update? |
I've created a couple of milestones and have made 1.2 be the goal to switch the license. I don't think it will be too hard to do 1.2, but a workshop happening this week prevents me from doing more right now. Sorry for the continued delays... |
@mhucka that's extremely gentle of you to consider this change and following through on this! |
This is now done! Thank you for your patience, and also for using Nostril! |
Thank you very much for this! 🙇♂️ |
Hello!
I maintain https://github.com/nexB/scancode-toolkit and I have been looking for such a library which looks really nice (my use case is to remove gibberish from the strings collected from binaries). ScanCode is Apache-licensed. Would you consider some other licensing for nostril, such as any of a classpath-like exception to the GPL, the LGPL or any other permissive license?
Thank you for you kind consideration!
NB: incidentally, scancode may be of some use in the CASICS project.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: