-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 212
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
[FEATURE] turtle need fuel for any action #2034
Comments
Just nitpicking, but CC:T is powerful tool only in vanilla-like style modpacks. |
I believe that this ignores the very OP item transfer abilities of CC:T that can allow someone to have autocrafting with stone and redstone (and some programming), unless you’re speaking exclusively about turtles. |
imo the purpose of CC:T is introduce the fun of programming. if you don't program by yourself but just directly take someone else's, then you won't enjoy the time to make an "OP" achievement. |
I personally do not against to add fuel usage to all actions, this may involve more challenge on base design. But I hope (if the idea is accepted) the default fuel usage/ratio can be balanced between actions (e.g. dig block (maybe) should consume less fuel than moving). |
You will get only vanilla-compatible autocrafting and, well, not a very nice one. Iron and diamonds are not so expensive in non-vanilla modpacks and refined storage or AE2 ofter provides more value much faster, especially if you consider that CC item transfer are wired only and networks are 64 blocks limited, if I am not mistaken. And you will spend a lot of time to configure, setup and probably partully rewrite this autocraft system. It is a lot fun, of course, but I doubt it is overpowered in any sense. |
CC's item transfer system is definitely something which needs balancing, but probably off-topic for this issue. I don't think auto-crafting is especially OP, given that a CC turtle roughly costs the same as a vanilla auto-crafter. |
It is mainly an additional layer of challenge. Fuel in itself can be automated anyway and to require a more elaborate refuel-system early on would certainly add fun for me. Auto-crafting aside, there are also havesting-turtles or wood-chopping turtles that, without moving, are oftentimes an exploit mechanism in my play style. Of course, this is opinionated - hence the feature request. :) |
Turtles need fuel to move but for no other action. I propose, that (if player/server opt-in via config) any action should use fuel.
This would make sense in terms of game design:
ComputerCraft is a very powerful tool, especially when using turtles. If CC is integrated into a Minecraft game with more focus on balancing and actual gameplay interaction it is very hard to put limits or add difficulty to CC.
Also fuel consumption can be turned off in the config, hence reducing game difficulty. There should be an option to do the opposite.
I have not looked at the code so I can't judge the implications of this. Still, I would be interested in arguments against this proposal and pointers to illustrative code. :)
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: