Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Adopt Tx prioritization #291

Closed
liamsi opened this issue Apr 11, 2022 · 1 comment
Closed

Adopt Tx prioritization #291

liamsi opened this issue Apr 11, 2022 · 1 comment

Comments

@liamsi
Copy link
Member

liamsi commented Apr 11, 2022

Summary

With upgrading the SDK to 0.46.x (beta is tagged) and tendermint 0.35.x, we get Tx prioritization. But we should make sure that this also properly applies to messages/data in the same namespace. Or as @musalbas put it:

for validators I think we should introduce a tx prioritisation mechanism where if there are multiple transactions in the same namespace, the one that pays the highest fees gets included first
When ordering messages in the block
This is so that sovereign zk rollups can impose block size limits... Because generating proofs is expensive (edited)
So DoS resistance is needed

This is somewhat critical for launch and hence for incentivized testnet too. Let's add a test-case that asserts the above behaviour.

@evan-forbes
Copy link
Member

closing as we updated to v0.46 of the sdk, but also created #513

Repository owner moved this from TODO to Done in Celestia Node Jul 1, 2022
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
No open projects
Archived in project
Development

No branches or pull requests

3 participants