Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Create a section for testnets and their purpose #1254

Closed
evan-forbes opened this issue Nov 7, 2023 · 7 comments
Closed

Create a section for testnets and their purpose #1254

evan-forbes opened this issue Nov 7, 2023 · 7 comments
Assignees
Labels
documentation Improvements or additions to documentation

Comments

@evan-forbes
Copy link
Member

We should formalize the purpose of the main longer lived testnets by documenting them. We all have social consensus around mocha being the network that is as close to mainnet as possible, but I don't think we have a formalized role for arabica. It could be useful to document to users that they should use mocha for longer term tests, and use arabica for bleeding edge things such as UX changes.

cc @cmwaters @Bidon15

Discussions around the purpose of arabica are likely outside the scope this issue, however we should likely come to consensus over that before we can create docs and thus close this issue.

@jcstein jcstein added the documentation Improvements or additions to documentation label Nov 10, 2023
@jcstein jcstein self-assigned this Nov 17, 2023
@Mackenzie-OO7
Copy link
Contributor

@jcstein Hi, i'd like to work on this. Could you provide more details on what is expected in this section?

@jcstein
Copy link
Member

jcstein commented Feb 15, 2024

gm @Mackenzie-OO7 - I'm actually fairly certain it's covered as an overview in https://docs.celestia.org/nodes/participate, but maybe the pages for mainnet/arabica/mocha could use a review of whether they speak to the differences in the networks and their individual purposes.

@Mackenzie-OO7
Copy link
Contributor

gm @Mackenzie-OO7 - I'm actually fairly certain it's covered as an overview in https://docs.celestia.org/nodes/participate, but maybe the pages for mainnet/arabica/mocha could use a review of whether they speak to the differences in the networks and their individual purposes.

Alright, thank you for clarifying. Let me take a look at them.

@jcstein
Copy link
Member

jcstein commented Feb 16, 2024

cc’ing @rootulp for a second set of eyes here. i think maybe we can edit existing pages, but curious what you think

@rootulp
Copy link
Contributor

rootulp commented Feb 19, 2024

I think the content on https://docs.celestia.org/nodes/participate addresses this issue. Specifically:

A devnet focused on developers who want to deploy sovereign rollups on the latest changes from Celestia's codebase. Arabica will be updated frequently and might be unstable at times given new updates.

and

A testnet focused on enabling validators to test out their infrastructure by running nodes connected to the network.

@jcstein
Copy link
Member

jcstein commented Feb 19, 2024

agreed. i think we can close this issue, if anyone has reasons to reopen it, please do 😄

@jcstein jcstein closed this as completed Feb 19, 2024
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
documentation Improvements or additions to documentation
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

4 participants