-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 1
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Standard names containing 'difference' #28
Comments
I agree, it should be documented. I believe that when such names have been defined the understanding has been that |
The three standard names |
I too have always interpreted |
Thank you for your proposal. These terms will be added to the cfeditor (http://cfeditor.ceda.ac.uk/proposals/1) shortly. Your proposal will then be reviewed and commented on by the community and Standard Names moderator. |
Hi @JonathanGregory @taylor13, I am revisiting this issue as it has been open for a couple of years without a conclusion. Do you think it would be useful to add some explanatory text in the phrasebank for the phrase Could there also be the possibility of adding this somewhere in the Guidelines for Construction of Standard Names, or even the CF conventions document, to provide an example for the use of the phrase in standard names? Best wishes, |
Dear Ellie Yes, it would be useful to add explanatory text for I think the existing definitions of the standard names Best wishes Jonathan |
Dear Jonathan @JonathanGregory, Thanks for your reply. In that case, might I suggest transferring this to a discussion if more input is needed, particularly from the CF governance panel/conventions committee? Or if there are clear actions which can be identified at this point (i.e. sign convention and direction), perhaps transferring to the cf-conventions/discuss repo (unless you think the vocabularies repo would be the most appropriate/preferable location for it). Best wishes, |
Dear Ellie I think it would be fine to do these things arising from this issue:
I will ask people who might know about the "difference" question. Jonathan |
Yes, this sounds good. Thanks. |
Steve Griffies agrees that in the standard names |
Thanks for getting Steve's expert opinion. Sounds good. |
This issue has had no activity in the last 30 days. Accordingly:
Standard name moderators are also reminded to review @feggleton @japamment @efisher008 |
Not sure we have a moderator, and I can't volunteer. Maybe that's why this has stalled. To be sure @JonathanGregory, I guess the sign of the difference mentioned in conjunction with defining a mixed layer thickness (e.g., the If that's the case, I think we've reached consensus and what's needed is to augment the descriptions of all standard names containing the word "difference". Is that right? |
Yes, I agree with you, Karl @taylor13. |
This issue has had no activity in the last 30 days. Accordingly:
Standard name moderators are also reminded to review @feggleton @japamment @efisher008 |
There are several standard names that describe temperature differences: difference_between_sea_surface_temperature_and_air_temperature, sea_water_sigma_t_difference, and the incredibly succinct sea_water_temperature_difference.
Is there a convention for which term is subtracted from the other? If so, is this documented somewhere, and, in any case, should it be in the definition? I checked the conventions document, the guidelines for constructing standard names, and some of the definitions themselves, and can't find the answer to this.
There are also some names containing the similar concept 'relative', and at least one includes the kind of info I'm looking for; the definition of northward_air_velocity_relative_to_sea_water includes the phrase ' ... calculated as northward_wind minus northward_sea_water_velocity.'
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: