Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

📡 ̶F̶u̶n̶d̶a̶m̶e̶n̶t̶a̶l̶ ̶t̶h̶e̶o̶r̶e̶m̶ ̶o̶f̶ ̶c̶h̶e̶s̶s̶ ̶o̶s̶c̶i̶l̶l̶a̶t̶i̶o̶n̶s̶ refuted #697

Closed
programarivm opened this issue Dec 20, 2024 · 1 comment
Labels

Comments

@programarivm
Copy link
Member

programarivm commented Dec 20, 2024

A chess position cannot be decoded and converted back from an array of oscillations.

A chess position cannot always be decoded and converted back from an array of oscillations in an array of arrays like the following example.

$expected = [ 1, 1, 0, 1, -1, 0, 0, 0, 0, 1, 1, 0, 0, 0, -1, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 1, 0, 0, 0, -1, 0, 0, 0, 0, 1, 0, 1 ];

The same thing goes for a continuous counterpart, even though the loss of information significantly decreases with continuous oscillations.

See:

@programarivm
Copy link
Member Author

Think of a chessboard in three-dimensional space so that every time a piece moves, the board tilts to one of its four quadrants: Northwest, Northeast, Southwest, Southeast.

It seems that there is no longer any need to define more evaluation features in an attempt to further unbalance the two-dimensional plane:

#703

The fundamental theorem of chess oscillations is refuted by introducing the equilibrium factor φ into the chess signal.

@programarivm programarivm changed the title 📡 Fundamental theorem of chess oscillations 📡 Fundamental theorem of chess oscillations refuted Dec 21, 2024
@programarivm programarivm changed the title 📡 Fundamental theorem of chess oscillations refuted 📡 ̶F̶u̶n̶d̶a̶m̶e̶n̶t̶a̶l̶ ̶t̶h̶e̶o̶r̶e̶m̶ ̶o̶f̶ ̶c̶h̶e̶s̶s̶ ̶o̶s̶c̶i̶l̶l̶a̶t̶i̶o̶n̶s̶ refuted Dec 21, 2024
@programarivm programarivm unpinned this issue Dec 21, 2024
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

1 participant