You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Think of a chessboard in three-dimensional space so that every time a piece moves, the board tilts to one of its four quadrants: Northwest, Northeast, Southwest, Southeast.
It seems that there is no longer any need to define more evaluation features in an attempt to further unbalance the two-dimensional plane:
programarivm
changed the title
📡 Fundamental theorem of chess oscillations
📡 Fundamental theorem of chess oscillations refuted
Dec 21, 2024
programarivm
changed the title
📡 Fundamental theorem of chess oscillations refuted
📡 ̶F̶u̶n̶d̶a̶m̶e̶n̶t̶a̶l̶ ̶t̶h̶e̶o̶r̶e̶m̶ ̶o̶f̶ ̶c̶h̶e̶s̶s̶ ̶o̶s̶c̶i̶l̶l̶a̶t̶i̶o̶n̶s̶ refuted
Dec 21, 2024
A chess position cannot always be decoded and converted back from an array of oscillations in an array of arrays like the following example.
The same thing goes for a continuous counterpart, even though the loss of information significantly decreases with continuous oscillations.
See:
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: