You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Thank you for the insightful paper. It would be great if you plan to release the code in the near future so that I can have a better understanding of your work.
Besides, from your paper, the performance of SimCLR is much lower than the ones reported in the original paper (90+% accuracy on CIFAR-10 training from scratch). I am wondering if there is any reason that you are using a much weaker baseline. Since SimCLR also reported the hyper-parameters they used, it would be interesting to see if CLAE can still improve over the strong baselines. Thank you for your time in advance.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
Hi author of CLAE,
Thank you for the insightful paper. It would be great if you plan to release the code in the near future so that I can have a better understanding of your work.
Besides, from your paper, the performance of SimCLR is much lower than the ones reported in the original paper (90+% accuracy on CIFAR-10 training from scratch). I am wondering if there is any reason that you are using a much weaker baseline. Since SimCLR also reported the hyper-parameters they used, it would be interesting to see if CLAE can still improve over the strong baselines. Thank you for your time in advance.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: