Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Allow defining AruDice #92

Open
integraledelebesgue opened this issue Dec 15, 2024 · 1 comment
Open

Allow defining AruDice #92

integraledelebesgue opened this issue Dec 15, 2024 · 1 comment
Labels
arudice An issue related to AruDice and analysis of the observations recorded after introducing them blocked feature New feature or request framework A general, framework-related topic

Comments

@integraledelebesgue
Copy link
Member

Rationale

AruDice have a formal representation in the framework. An easy way to input them into the pipeline should exist, too.

Task

  • Make AruDice definitions a part of the framework configuration
@integraledelebesgue integraledelebesgue converted this from a draft issue Dec 15, 2024
@integraledelebesgue integraledelebesgue added feature New feature or request arudice An issue related to AruDice and analysis of the observations recorded after introducing them framework A general, framework-related topic blocked labels Dec 15, 2024
@integraledelebesgue
Copy link
Member Author

Requires #93

@integraledelebesgue integraledelebesgue changed the title Support defining AruDice Allow defining AruDice Jan 8, 2025
@integraledelebesgue integraledelebesgue moved this from Backlog to TODO in ChildLab Framework Jan 8, 2025
@integraledelebesgue integraledelebesgue moved this from TODO to Backlog in ChildLab Framework Jan 8, 2025
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
arudice An issue related to AruDice and analysis of the observations recorded after introducing them blocked feature New feature or request framework A general, framework-related topic
Projects
Status: Backlog
Development

No branches or pull requests

1 participant