Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

question: Which methods are suitable for noisy outcomes? #5

Open
BlackEdder opened this issue Jun 12, 2024 · 1 comment
Open

question: Which methods are suitable for noisy outcomes? #5

BlackEdder opened this issue Jun 12, 2024 · 1 comment

Comments

@BlackEdder
Copy link

We are using an Individual Based Model (IBM) to model transmission of AMR. As such we end up with multiple net monetary benefit values per (transmission) parameter set. As far as I understand this is no problem when calculating EVP(P)I, because it is based around the expected value, but supposedly some methods will fail? For example, Gaussian Processes need to be adjusted to be able to take this into account (e.g. https://cran.r-project.org/web/packages/GPM/GPM.pdf)

Do you happen to know which methods are suitable for such model outcomes and which would not be?

@chjackson
Copy link
Owner

chjackson commented Jun 12, 2024

Any of the methods can be used if you can estimate the expected net benefit (over a population of individuals) given specific parameter values. For individual-based models, the obvious way is to take an average of the individual-level outputs for each set of parameter values.

Though I don't know what the most computationally efficient approach would be (e.g. how many parameter samples vs how many individual samples), or if there are more efficient VoI estimators designed for microsimulation.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants