You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
I noticed that the GHMCIntegrator uses the "O{VRV}O" splitting method, while the LangevinIntegrator uses the "VRORV" splitting method. I am confusing the difference between "O{VRV}O" and "VRORV." Would it be possible for the GHMCIntegrator to produce the same results if it adopted the "{VRORV}" splitting method instead?
If I want to combine the generalized hybrid Monte Carlo with MTSLangevin, which splitting method would be better?
Additionally, I noticed that in the OpenMM MSTLangevinIntegrator code, the v is not computed in the first "R" step (detailed code shown below). Why is this the case? code link
For example, if I want to combine the generalized hybrid Monte Carlo with MTSLangevin for force group [(0,2), (1,1)], should the splitting method be "O{V1 V0 R V0 V0 R V0 V1}O"?
Appreciate it if someone could address my question.
Hi,
I noticed that the GHMCIntegrator uses the "O{VRV}O" splitting method, while the LangevinIntegrator uses the "VRORV" splitting method. I am confusing the difference between "O{VRV}O" and "VRORV." Would it be possible for the GHMCIntegrator to produce the same results if it adopted the "{VRORV}" splitting method instead?
If I want to combine the generalized hybrid Monte Carlo with MTSLangevin, which splitting method would be better?
Additionally, I noticed that in the OpenMM MSTLangevinIntegrator code, the v is not computed in the first "R" step (detailed code shown below). Why is this the case?
code link
Looking forward to your reply!
Best regards.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: