Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Sync metadata by default & for all clusters #5304

Open
49 of 65 tasks
onderkalaci opened this issue Sep 17, 2021 · 3 comments
Open
49 of 65 tasks

Sync metadata by default & for all clusters #5304

onderkalaci opened this issue Sep 17, 2021 · 3 comments
Labels

Comments

@onderkalaci
Copy link
Member

onderkalaci commented Sep 17, 2021

In this issue, I wanted to list some of the things we need in order to enable Citus MX on all clusters. Assuming that we enable this feature on Citus 11.0, all the clusters upgrading from earlier version would sync metadata to all nodes.

update citus_local_table set a = random()::int; 
DEBUG: functions used in UPDATE queries on distributed tables must not be VOLATILE
@onderkalaci onderkalaci added the mx label Sep 17, 2021
@marcocitus
Copy link
Member

marcocitus commented Sep 17, 2021

Local tables: All tables are auto-converted to Citus local tables #5305

This relates to the discussion in #3851 . I don't think it is strictly necessary for an MVP as long as we have a fallback mechanism for views and functions.

It does seem like a "should have", given the general problem of local tables in MX.

@marcocitus
Copy link
Member

marcocitus commented Sep 17, 2021

Maybe merge mx- schedules as all the schedules are now MX

It would be good if we can have a SQL-oriented schedule that gets repeated on a worker.

@onderkalaci
Copy link
Member Author

I don't think it is strictly necessary for an MVP as long as we have a fallback mechanism for views and functions.

Agreed, this issue mostly aims to describe Ultimate experience :)

local tables #5305

Github seems to add a new feature, if you click on a task item, it opens an issue. So, 5305 opened accidentally. I agree that 3851 has more information

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants