Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Why the training effect is good on my own data, but the testing effect is poor? #33

Open
fanzz1208 opened this issue Mar 14, 2024 · 1 comment

Comments

@fanzz1208
Copy link

Training progress: 100%|__________________________________________________________| 30000/30000 [1:58:29<00:00, 4.22it/s, Loss=0.0295401]
2024-03-14 03:49:43,489 - INFO:
[ITER 30000] Evaluating test: L1 0.2103012849887212 PSNR 11.615882555643717
2024-03-14 03:50:12,150 - INFO:
[ITER 30000] Evaluating train: L1 0.01723341103643179 PSNR 32.359920501708984

@inspirelt
Copy link
Collaborator

According to your previous issue #29 (comment), I guess that you pose is very poor, making the learned gaussians fail to generalize to novel views.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants