Adds new resource cloudflare_ip_list

[cehrig]

This PR adds a new resource for managing account-level IP Lists (https://blog.cloudflare.com/introducing-ip-lists/)

WIP:
- Write acceptance tests
- Update cloudflare-go @jacobbednarz, i might need a hand here
- Documentation

Sample resource block

resource "cloudflare_ip_list" "example" {
  account_id = "d41d8cd98f00b204e9800998ecf8427e"
  name = "example_list"
  kind = "ip"
  description = "list description"

  item {
    value = "192.0.2.0"
    comment = "one"
  }

  item {
    value = "192.0.2.1"
    comment = "two"
  }
}

[jacobbednarz]

Does IP Lists have public API support yet? If not, I'd probably wait for that to see what the schema needs to support.

[cehrig]

Does IP Lists have public API support yet? If not, I'd probably wait for that to see what the schema needs to support.

@jacobbednarz That's IP Lists aka Rules Lists we put to cloudflare-go some weeks ago: cloudflare/cloudflare-go#507

[jacobbednarz]

Ahhh, I remember that PR but didn't associate it with the issue I raised and thought was still open. Good to see!

[jacobbednarz]

As for the updated dependency, once a new release is created an automatic PR will be opened here. If it's about time for a new release, we can ping @patryk to take a look.

[cehrig]

Sounds good. I honestly was expecting the checks to fail because vendor/ is not yet updated. So either I don't fully understand Go modules or the checks are not building the final binary and they are passing because Unit Tests are not yet written.

[jacobbednarz]

I suspect we will need the ID to be a composite ID of accountID/listID to allow people with access to multiple accounts to determine which one they would like to manage.

[cehrig]

Oh thanks for raising this. I was a victim to DefaultFunc: schema.EnvDefaultFunc("CLOUDFLARE_ACCOUNT_ID", nil), in provider.go ... I'll get the whole PR ready by - hopefully - tomorrow!

[jacobbednarz]

No rush! I just finally had some time this morning to review some PRs and yours was at the top of the list 🙂

[cehrig]

This is fixed

[jacobbednarz]

Looks pretty reasonable so far 👍 A question around multiple account usage but we'll also need some tests when you're ready.

[cehrig]

Okay, I think this is in a decent shape. Reviews appreciated :-)

[jacobbednarz]

I've pushed 5794234 as the test account has a limit of 1 list at a time and the parallel tests step on top of one another.

[jacobbednarz]

🙇‍♂️ thanks heaps for this @cehrig!