Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Don't automatically add CNCF as an employer based on LinkedIn #311

Open
craigbox opened this issue Mar 15, 2024 · 3 comments
Open

Don't automatically add CNCF as an employer based on LinkedIn #311

craigbox opened this issue Mar 15, 2024 · 3 comments
Assignees
Labels
blocked question Further information is requested

Comments

@craigbox
Copy link
Contributor

A large number of LFX mentorship students add the CNCF to their LinkedIn profile. This means their contribution shows up in devstats as being related to the CNCF, which isn't really true.

Likewise, I joined the Governing Board recently and updated LinkedIn to reflect this. My affiliation was (automatically?) updated to CNCF in this commit, and hand-set dates were lost in favour of automatically added ones

Some possible suggestions:

(a) don't add a new affiliation based on LinkedIn if the old one has not ended
(b) maintain a list of affiliations not to automatically add, and have the CNCF be on that
(c) audit everyone listed as "CNCF" to only actually be paid CNCF staff (optional)

@lukaszgryglicki
Copy link
Member

Hi, I have no opinion there and actually no idea if there is any action item for me or not. LMK if you want me to do something with this.

@lukaszgryglicki lukaszgryglicki self-assigned this Mar 25, 2024
@lukaszgryglicki lukaszgryglicki added the question Further information is requested label Mar 25, 2024
@craigbox
Copy link
Contributor Author

I offered some suggestions, but ultimately if you don't feel empowered to decide, who should I talk to next?

@lukaszgryglicki
Copy link
Member

Maybe @caniszczyk has some suggestions?
The simplest to implement will be either (b) (I can do this in my scripts) or (a) (can be done while searching for affiliations), (c) would be the most accurate IMHO but also needs external people to confirm their status.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
blocked question Further information is requested
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants