You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
RFC 9637 was just released, and it describes a new reserved IPv6 address prefix for documentation purposes, namely 3fff::/20. The reasoning is that the existing documentation prefix, 2001:db8::/32, is too small to reflect "many realistic, current deployment scenarios."
Adding this new doc prefix to CNP3 is either very simple (as in: add one line to mention the additional block and its RFC), or very time-consuming (as in: make good use of the new prefix in new examples throughout, etc.)
I can probably offer to implement the first option if you don't mind to wait a little while, maybe one month or so, for a pull request.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
RFC 9637 was just released, and it describes a new reserved IPv6 address prefix for documentation purposes, namely 3fff::/20. The reasoning is that the existing documentation prefix, 2001:db8::/32, is too small to reflect "many realistic, current deployment scenarios."
Adding this new doc prefix to CNP3 is either very simple (as in: add one line to mention the additional block and its RFC), or very time-consuming (as in: make good use of the new prefix in new examples throughout, etc.)
I can probably offer to implement the first option if you don't mind to wait a little while, maybe one month or so, for a pull request.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: