-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 3.8k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
roachtest: tpchvec/perf failed #46664
Comments
|
cc @yuzefovich do you think we might've introduced a memory accounting leak in a recent change? |
so it happened with |
Yes, I believe the fix to memory accounting in hash aggregator is the reason we hit a memory limit here, and unless we messed up the fixes that went in (I'm a little concerned about the first one, about the "internal" memory of Are you looking at
|
I guess I don't understand how |
Ok, I see what's happening. Here is the corresponding part of the plan when I left reusing the same account as a TODO because I thought it would be too invasive of a change at this point (plus would be harder to backport), but it seems like now it could be considered a release blocker since we're likely to error out on OLAP-y queries with rowexec aggregation when, in fact, we do have enough RAM to succeed. cc @jordanlewis for your opinion on this. |
cc @rohany it is possible that |
(roachtest).tpchvec/perf failed on master@0e9f07ae35ad39e8789bc51c49066c123968a666:
More
Artifacts: /tpchvec/perf
See this test on roachdash |
(roachtest).tpchvec/perf failed on master@92495ffb2182671b3338a8c6cd2734cb6de5d392:
More
Artifacts: /tpchvec/perf
See this test on roachdash |
Good catch. 540k groups is crazy... |
(roachtest).tpchvec/perf failed on master@c0855e9fcf979cca1094d7edeeacb9882ddc9f96:
More
Artifacts: /tpchvec/perf
Related:
See this test on roachdash
powered by pkg/cmd/internal/issues
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: