Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

raft: why the raft log does not use a separate rocksdb instance? #46773

Closed
jiadexin opened this issue Mar 31, 2020 · 1 comment
Closed

raft: why the raft log does not use a separate rocksdb instance? #46773

jiadexin opened this issue Mar 31, 2020 · 1 comment
Assignees

Comments

@jiadexin
Copy link
Contributor

Is your feature request related to a problem? Please describe.
why the raft log does not use a separate rocksdb instance?

Describe the solution you'd like
The current raft log instance and the kv data instance both share the same rocksdb. I wonder why the raft log does not use a separate rocksdb instance? I think this performance should be better.

Describe alternatives you've considered
The raft log use a separate rocksdb instance

@irfansharif
Copy link
Contributor

We are actually looking to separate out our raft storage from the shared rocksdb/pebble instance, we're just not quite all the way there yet. The current next step is #39182, and something I'm currently working, before we can fully flesh out the work that'd go into separating out raft storage in its own storage device.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants