You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Azure does not provide a 2500 GB option; we used the average cost of a 2TB option and scaled it to 2.5TB.
If I understand correctly, on azure, a 2.5TB premium disk will cost the same as a 4TB premium disk, while a 2.5TB ultra disk will cost the same as a 3TB ultra disk. The former is the disk size as presented to the virtual machine, the latter is the actual disk size. In this case, it so happens that there is no performance difference between a 2TB and a 4TB premium disk, nor between a 2TB and a 3TB ultra disk, thus the performance numbers should be still fair to other providers. However, the pricing calculation as quoted above can still be misleading.
Going forward, the best approach is probably to use either a 2TB disk or a 4TB disk, to cater to azure.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
From the report:
If I understand correctly, on azure, a 2.5TB premium disk will cost the same as a 4TB premium disk, while a 2.5TB ultra disk will cost the same as a 3TB ultra disk. The former is the disk size as presented to the virtual machine, the latter is the actual disk size. In this case, it so happens that there is no performance difference between a 2TB and a 4TB premium disk, nor between a 2TB and a 3TB ultra disk, thus the performance numbers should be still fair to other providers. However, the pricing calculation as quoted above can still be misleading.
Going forward, the best approach is probably to use either a 2TB disk or a 4TB disk, to cater to azure.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: