You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Sprint 2: As a politician, I want a website that uses appropriate language to that I can effectively communicate how the city uses tax money (text) (3 points) 1/13/25
#13
Open
grsrivera opened this issue
Jan 14, 2025
· 1 comment
Done: Have the City read it and tell us it achieves their standards.
-Add that the government 175% rule allows the government to fix the ratio.
-Review all the text so that it doesn't seem like the city is benefiting a group in particular or wasting money.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
grsrivera
changed the title
4) As a politician, I want a website that uses appropriate language to that I can effectively communicate how the city uses tax money (3 points)
4) As a politician, I want a website that uses appropriate language to that I can effectively communicate how the city uses tax money (3 points) 1/14/25
Jan 16, 2025
bhavanipasumarthi
changed the title
4) As a politician, I want a website that uses appropriate language to that I can effectively communicate how the city uses tax money (3 points) 1/14/25
4) As a politician, I want a website that uses appropriate language to that I can effectively communicate how the city uses tax money (text) (3 points) 1/14/25
Jan 17, 2025
bhavanipasumarthi
changed the title
4) As a politician, I want a website that uses appropriate language to that I can effectively communicate how the city uses tax money (text) (3 points) 1/14/25
Sprint 2: As a politician, I want a website that uses appropriate language to that I can effectively communicate how the city uses tax money (text) (3 points) 1/13/25
Jan 17, 2025
Done: Have the City read it and tell us it achieves their standards.
-Add that the government 175% rule allows the government to fix the ratio.
-Review all the text so that it doesn't seem like the city is benefiting a group in particular or wasting money.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: