We'd love your help!
- Report a bug or requesting feature
- How to contribute
- Component Ownership
- Component Lifecycle
- Contributing Vendor Components
Reporting bugs is an important contribution. Please make sure to include:
- expected and actual behavior.
- Node version that application is running.
- OpenTelemetry version that application is using.
- if possible - repro application and steps to reproduce.
Please read project contribution guide for general practices for OpenTelemetry project.
The Conventional Commits specification is a lightweight convention on top of commit messages. It provides an easy set of rules for creating an explicit commit history; which makes it easier to write automated tools on top of. This convention dovetails with SemVer, by describing the features, fixes, and breaking changes made in commit messages. You can see examples here.
We use commitlint and husky to prevent bad commit message.
For example, you want to submit the following commit message git commit -s -am "my bad commit"
.
You will receive the following error :
✖ type must be one of [ci, feat, fix, docs, style, refactor, perf, test, revert, chore] [type-enum]
Here an exemple that will pass the verification: git commit -s -am "chore(opentelemetry-core): update deps"
In the interest of keeping this repository clean and manageable, you should work from a fork. To create a fork, click the 'Fork' button at the top of the repository, then clone the fork locally using git clone git@github.com:USERNAME/opentelemetry-js-contrib.git
.
You should also add this repository as an "upstream" repo to your local copy, in order to keep it up to date. You can add this as a remote like so:
git remote add upstream https://github.com/open-telemetry/opentelemetry-js-contrib.git
#verify that the upstream exists
git remote -v
To update your fork, fetch the upstream repo's branches and commits, then merge your main with upstream's main:
git fetch upstream
git checkout main
git merge upstream/main
Remember to always work in a branch of your local copy, as you might otherwise have to contend with conflicts in main.
Please also see GitHub workflow section of general project contributing guide.
The opentelemetry-js-contrib
project is written in TypeScript.
npm install
to install dependencies.npm run compile
compiles the code, checking for type errors.npm test
tests code the same way that our CI will test it.npm run lint:fix
lint (and maybe fix) any changes.
npm run docs
to generate API documentation. Generates the documentation inpackages/opentelemetry-api/docs/out
npm run changelog
to generate CHANGELOG documentation in your terminal (see RELEASING.md for more details).
When two or more approaches must be compared, please write a benchmark in the benchmark/index.js module so that we can keep track of the most efficient algorithm.
npm run bench
to run your benchmark.
This repository contains many components which are maintained by more than the typical set of JS maintainers and approvers. Each component in this repository SHOULD have a component owner who is responsible for maintaining it. The README.md for each component SHOULD contain its owner, but the source of truth for component ownership is in .github/component_owners.yml. Component owners are generally given authority to make decisions relating to implementation and feature requests for their components, provided they follow the best practices set out by the maintainers. Component owners MUST do their best to maintain a high level of quality, security, performance, and specification compliance within their components. Maintainers may override the decisions of component owners, but should only do so when they feel one or more of these traits is compromised.
This repository contains many components in various stages of the component lifecycle. A component may be unreleased, experimental, beta, stable, unmaintained, or deprecated; see the below definitions for each stability level. With the exception of the stable status, it is up to each individual component owner to determine the status of a component. A component may only be marked stable with the approval of a member of @open-telemetry/javascript-maintainers; see the definition of stable below for more details.
Unreleased components are in active development and have not yet been released to NPM.
Unreleased packages should have the property private
in their package.json
set to true
.
Experimental packages are in active development.
They should be considered unstable and potentially unsuitable for production use.
They are released to NPM for developers and early adopters.
Experimental components MUST have their major version set to 0
.
If a component does not have an explicit status in its README.md file, it should be considered to be experimental.
Beta packages are not yet considered stable, but an effort should be made to preserve stability across versions if possible.
They may be ready for production use, but users should understand that their APIs or the telemetry they output MAY change if required.
Beta components MUST have their major version set to 0
.
This is the highest level of quality and maintainership guarantee provided in this repository. Stable packages should be considered stable and ready for production use. In order for a package to be marked stable, it must meet the following requirements:
- It MUST have a component owner that the JS maintainers feel confident will be responsive to issues and pull requests and will fulfill their responsibility competently. If a component owner is not responsive to issues and PRs, the maintainers may assign a new owner or change the status of the component to unmaintained.
- All relevant specification relating to the component MUST be stable. For example, telemetry emitted by an instrumentation library should rely on a stable semantic convention.
- It MUST be reviewed and approved by a member of @open-telemetry/javascript-maintainers.
Stable components MUST have their major version set to 1
or greater.
A component which does not have an assigned component owner, or has a component owner who has been unresponsive to issues and pull requests may be marked as unmaintained. Unmaintained components may continue to work and receive updates and fixes from contributors, but may not receive immediate attention if there is a problem or feature request. A component which is unmaintained may be deprecated if there is a problem that is not fixed in a timely manner.
Deprecated components are no longer maintained and there are not currently plans to maintain them. They may not work and there are no guarantees for fixes or new features. Their source files may be deleted from the repository. Any packages released from their source will be marked as deprecated in NPM.
This repo is generally meant for hosting components that work with popular open-source frameworks and tools. However, it is also possible to contribute components specific to a 3rd party vendor in this repo.
Vendor components that are hosted in this repo will be versioned the same as all other contrib components, and released in lockstep with them under the @opentelemetry
org in npm.
In exchange, vendor component contributors are expected to:
- Include documentation for the component that covers:
- The installation and getting started process for the component
- Any configuration for the component
- Any APIs exposed by the component
- Design information for the component if relevant
- Add enough unit tests to at least meet the current coverage
- Assign at least one full-time engineer to their component in the CODEOWNERS file
- Review pull requests that touch their component
- Respond to issues related to their component, as determined by the maintainers
- Fix failing unit tests or any other blockers to the CI/CD workflow
- Update their components' usage of Core APIs upon the introduction of breaking changes upstream
All vendor components are subject to removal from the repo at the sole discretion of the maintainers. Reasons for removal include but are not limited to failing to adhere to any of the expectations defined above in a timely manner. "Timely manner" can vary depending on the urgency of the task, for example if a flaky unit test is blocking a release for the entire repo that would be far more urgent than responding to a question about usage. As a rule of thumb, 2-3 business days is a good goal for non-urgent response times.