You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
I have a concern about the efficiency of 'insertBatch'. Would it be better to use 'insert into xx select xx union select xx ' instead of loop when having small data?
well...exclude duplicate rows
thx & kind rgds
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
Possibly. Care to create some benchmarks and test it?
My biggest concern would be that it works for all of the database engines that CI3 currently supports. Aside from that, if there's a boost for small datasets but it slows down on larger datasets, we'd have to do a bunch of testing on all of those platforms to find where the happy medium is across all of them.
While I wasn't involved in writing the insertBatch query, I'm guessing those elements played a big part in it.
Hi there,
I have a concern about the efficiency of 'insertBatch'. Would it be better to use 'insert into xx select xx union select xx ' instead of loop when having small data?
well...exclude duplicate rows
thx & kind rgds
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: