Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Deduplicate - perimeter in a grid #127

Closed
3 tasks done
hobovsky opened this issue Aug 18, 2022 · 7 comments
Closed
3 tasks done

Deduplicate - perimeter in a grid #127

hobovsky opened this issue Aug 18, 2022 · 7 comments
Assignees
Labels
discussion/deduplicate Discussion and vote what to do with duplicate kata

Comments

@hobovsky
Copy link
Contributor

hobovsky commented Aug 18, 2022

Reported on the wiki list of duplicates.

  1. Simple Fun #85: Polygon Perimeter
  • 6 kyu
  • 95% with 190 completions
  • 1 pending issue
  • 4 languages, no pending translations. Exclusive: C#, Ruby
  • Published Feb 2017, author inactive
  1. Land perimeter
  • 5 kyu
  • 95% with 1.9k solutions
  • No pending issues
  • 5 languages + 1 pending translation. Exclusive: CS, Haskell, PHP, COBOL
  • Published Nov 2016, author inactive

Conclusion

Filling gaps

  • Move C# translation from 1. to 2.
  • Move Ruby translation from 1. to 2.
@hobovsky
Copy link
Contributor Author

I have no real preference which one to keep, I will be fine with any decision.
Kata 1. has more languages, and potentially lower cost to move missing languages.
I like kata 2. a bit more because it's older, has more completions, and I think a more accurate rank.

If there will be no clear conclusion which one to keep, I think I will just flip a coin :)

@hobovsky hobovsky moved this to Discussing in Deduplication process Aug 18, 2022
@ejini6969
Copy link

I vote to keep 2 due to higher completion and appropriate ranks plus 1 might be potentially facing copyright issues ~~

@KayleighWasTaken
Copy link

Keep 2, older, more completions, etc. and as ejini said as well, I think 1 is from a site that doesn't like their stuff being put on CW.

@Kacarott
Copy link

Keep 2, cooler.

@monadius
Copy link

monadius commented Aug 19, 2022

Retire 1 because its description is copied from Codesignal. Moreover kata 2 has more languages (5 + 1 pending COBOL translation; I updated the original comment where available languages were swapped).

@akar-0
Copy link

akar-0 commented Aug 20, 2022

Keep 2 only.

@EloiseRosen
Copy link

vote for retire 1, keep 2

@hobovsky hobovsky moved this from Discussing to Filling gaps in Deduplication process Aug 25, 2022
@hobovsky hobovsky moved this from Filling gaps to Waiting for admin actions in Deduplication process Sep 15, 2022
@kazk kazk closed this as completed Sep 15, 2022
Repository owner moved this from Waiting for admin actions to Done in Deduplication process Sep 15, 2022
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
discussion/deduplicate Discussion and vote what to do with duplicate kata
Projects
Development

No branches or pull requests

8 participants