Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Deduplicate - NATO alphabet #204

Closed
2 tasks done
hobovsky opened this issue Aug 24, 2023 · 5 comments
Closed
2 tasks done

Deduplicate - NATO alphabet #204

hobovsky opened this issue Aug 24, 2023 · 5 comments
Assignees
Labels
discussion/deduplicate Discussion and vote what to do with duplicate kata

Comments

@hobovsky
Copy link
Contributor

hobovsky commented Aug 24, 2023

From wiki list

  1. NATO Phonetic Alphabet
  • 7 kyu.
  • Inputs are single words of only lowercase letters.
  • Satisfaction 92% with 5250 compeltions.
  • 3 pending issues, one about being a duplicate of 3.
  • 5 languages + 4 pending translations.
  • Published Oct 2014, author deleted.
  1. NATO Phonetic Alphabet Ruby
  • 6 kyu.
  • Generally just a Ruby translation of 1. with some additional obstacles (characters out of alphabet like punctuation, digits).
  • Satisfaction 78% with 76 completions.
  • 1 pending issue.
  • Ruby only.
  • Published Dec 2014, author inactive.
  1. If you can read this...
  • 6 kyu
  • Inputs are sentences with lowercase letters, punctuation, and spaces.
  • Satisfaction 87% with 10k+ completions.
  • 8 pending issues.
  • 10 languages + 4 pending translations.
  • Published Dec 2016, author active.

Conclusion

@hobovsky hobovsky converted this from a draft issue Aug 24, 2023
@hobovsky hobovsky moved this from Acknowledged to Discussing in Deduplication process Aug 24, 2023
@hobovsky
Copy link
Contributor Author

I would definitely retire 2.
Between 1. and 3., I think that I would keep 3. because it has more languages. But it has also many issues, so maybe it will be easier to just transfer/properly add the languages to 1.? I also like the fact that the 3. has sentences rather than single words.

@hobovsky hobovsky added the discussion/deduplicate Discussion and vote what to do with duplicate kata label Aug 25, 2023
@armeanco
Copy link

Retire:

  1. NATO Phonetic Alphabet
  2. NATO Phonetic Alphabet Ruby

@EloiseRosen
Copy link

vote for keep 3, retire the others

@awesomeAD1
Copy link

I agree with the others, keep 3.

@hobovsky
Copy link
Contributor Author

Looks like quite unanimous "Keep 3." to me.

@hobovsky hobovsky moved this from Discussing to Waiting for admin actions in Deduplication process Oct 21, 2023
@kazk kazk closed this as completed Oct 26, 2023
@github-project-automation github-project-automation bot moved this from Waiting for admin actions to Done in Deduplication process Oct 26, 2023
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
discussion/deduplicate Discussion and vote what to do with duplicate kata
Projects
Development

No branches or pull requests

5 participants